← Back to the Correlation And Regression worksheet
Last updated: October 22, 2026 · Written by the Math Made Easy math teachers

Standards: S-ID.B.5, S-ID.B.6, S-ID.C.7, S-ID.C.8, S-ID.C.9 · Level: Grade 9 Algebra 1
Problem 1 Complete the Totals
Rows: 24 + 16 = 40 and 18 + 22 = 40. Columns: 24 + 18 = 42 and 16 + 22 = 38. Grand total: 40 + 40 = 80 (and 42 + 38 = 80).
Row totals 40 and 40; column totals 42 and 38; 80 students
Problem 2 Joint Relative Frequency
Cell ÷ grand total: 24 ÷ 80 = 0.30.
0.30, or 30%
Problem 3 Marginal Relative Frequency
Column total ÷ grand total: 38 ÷ 80 = 0.475.
47.5%
Problem 4 Conditional Relative Frequency
8th graders preferring dogs: 18 out of the 8th-grade total 40, so 18 ÷ 40 = 0.45.
Cat lovers who are 8th graders: 22 out of 38, so 22 ÷ 38 ≈ 0.579.
45%; about 57.9%
Problem 5 Describe a Scatter Plot
As the temperature rises, sales rise: a positive association. The points stay close to a straight path: strong and linear. There is no obvious outlier.
Positive, strong, linear
Problem 6 Predict with a Line
At 80°F: 1.33(80) − 63.6 = 106.4 − 63.6 = 42.8 ≈ 43. At 66°F: 1.33(66) − 63.6 = 87.78 − 63.6 = 24.18 ≈ 24.
About 43 cups and 24 cups
Problem 7 Interpret Slope and Intercept
The slope 1.33 means each 1°F rise in temperature is associated with about 1.33 more cups sold.
The intercept −63.6 is the predicted sales at 0°F, which would be negative. Nothing was sold near 0°F and the data cover 62°F to 90°F, so the intercept has no real meaning.
Slope: about 1.33 more cups per degree; the intercept is not meaningful
Problem 8 Find a Residual
Predicted: 1.33(86) − 63.6 = 114.38 − 63.6 = 50.78. Residual = observed − predicted = 55 − 50.78 = 4.22.
Predicted 50.78; residual +4.22 (the point is above the line)
Problem 9 Residual Table
62: predicted 18.86, residual 1.14. 70: predicted 29.5, residual 1.5. 82: predicted 45.46, residual −2.46. 90: predicted 56.1, residual −2.1.
The residuals are small (all under 2.5 cups) and mix positive and negative values, so the line fits well.
1.14, 1.50, −2.46, −2.10; no clear pattern
Problem 10 Match the Correlation
The sign gives the direction and the size gives the strength: 0.95 is close to 1; −0.80 is close to −1; 0.05 is close to 0; −0.30 is negative but weak.
0.95 → (d); −0.80 → (a); 0.05 → (b); −0.30 → (c)
Problem 11 Ice Cream and Sunburn
A high r shows that the two variables rise together, not that one causes the other. Hot, sunny weather leads people to buy ice cream and also to get sunburned.
Correlation does not show causation; the lurking variable is hot, sunny weather
Problem 12 Conditional Frequency, Three Columns
Girls total: 35 + 25 + 20 = 80. Walkers among girls: 25 ÷ 80 = 0.3125.
Car total: 12 + 20 = 32. Boys among them: 12 ÷ 32 = 0.375.
31.25% of girls walk; 37.5% of car riders are boys
Problem 13 Read a Line from a Graph
Slope: (20 − 4) ÷ (8 − 0) = 2. The y-intercept is 4, so y = 2x + 4.
The plant grows about 2 cm per week and started at 4 cm. At week 11: 2(11) + 4 = 26.
y = 2x + 4; 2 cm per week; 4 cm at the start; 26 cm at week 11
Problem 14 Is the Prediction Safe?
At 30°F: 1.33(30) − 63.6 = −23.7, a negative number of cups. At 100°F: 133 − 63.6 = 69.4 cups.
Both temperatures lie outside the data range 62°F to 90°F, so both predictions are extrapolations. The first is clearly impossible; the second may also be unreliable.
−23.7 cups and 69.4 cups; extrapolation makes both unreliable
Problem 15 Regression by Calculator
Linear regression gives ŷ ≈ −15.3x + 387.5 and r ≈ −0.99.
Each extra hour of sleep is associated with a reaction time about 15.3 ms shorter. The value r ≈ −0.99 shows a very strong negative linear relationship.
ŷ ≈ −15.3x + 387.5; r ≈ −0.99
Problem 16 Build a Table from Percentages
Online with coupon: 0.45 × 120 = 54, so 66 without. In-store with coupon: 0.25 × 80 = 20, so 60 without.
| Coupon | No coupon | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Online | 54 | 66 | 120 |
| In-store | 20 | 60 | 80 |
| Total | 74 | 126 | 200 |
Among coupon users: 54 ÷ 74 ≈ 0.730.
About 73.0%
Problem 17 Residual Plot Pattern
The residuals form a U shape: positive at both ends and negative in the middle. If a line fit well, the residuals would scatter randomly around 0.
The pattern shows that the true relationship is curved, so a quadratic model would fit better.
No; the U-shaped residuals show a curved relationship
Problem 18 Line from Two Data Points
Slope: (300 − 420) ÷ (3 − 1) = −60. Intercept: 420 = −60(1) + b, so b = 480. Model: V = −60t + 480. Check at 5 years: −300 + 480 = 180 ✓.
The bike loses about $60 per year. At 6 years: −360 + 480 = 120. Value 0: 480 ÷ 60 = 8 years.
V = −60t + 480; $120 at 6 years; $0 at 8 years
Problem 19 Which Model Fits Better?
Model A: 16 + 1 + 4 + 9 = 30. Model B: 1 + 4 + 1 + 4 = 10.
The smaller sum means the points lie closer to the line, so Model B fits better.
A: 30; B: 10; Model B fits better
Problem 20 Firefighters and Damage
The value r = 0.78 shows a fairly strong positive association. It does not show that firefighters cause damage.
Bigger fires need more firefighters and also cause more damage, so the size of the fire drives both variables.
Correlation is not causation; the lurking variable is the size of the fire
